We're evaluating FieldPulse as part of a broader platform consolidation. One requirement from our executive team is maintaining continuity of service history for active customer accounts. Our current system contains approximately 18,000 completed work orders across five years of operation. Are there established pathways to migrate this historical data into FieldPulse, or is the expectation that we begin with a clean slate? I am specifically interested in whether the API supports bulk work order creation with historical dates, or if a managed migration service is available through FieldPulse Professional Services.
Keiko — from a governance perspective, I would raise two additional considerations for your executive team's deliberation.
Data Retention and Legal Hold: Before migrating five years of operational history, confirm your legal team's requirements regarding record retention. FieldPulse's default data retention policy (documented in the Data Retention settings) may differ from your current system's archival rules. It is worth noting that imported historical records are subject to the same retention and deletion policies as natively created records — there is no "grandfathered" status for migrated data.
Audit Trail Continuity: Your current system's audit history (who changed what, when) will not transfer via API. FieldPulse will record the import event itself, but the granular change history from your legacy platform will be lost. From a compliance perspective, consider whether you need to maintain the source system in read-only mode for a defined period to preserve that chain of custody.
Access Control Implications: Historical work orders will inherit the visibility rules of your current FieldPulse permission structure. If your previous system had different confidentiality models (e.g., technicians could only see their own history), verify that FieldPulse's role-based access can replicate this, or plan for a communication strategy if visibility expands.
I would recommend documenting the migration's scope and any intentional data loss (audit trails, attachment metadata, etc.) for your risk register.
Keiko — from a governance perspective, I would raise two additional considerations for your executive team's deliberation.
Data Retention and Legal Hold: Before migrating five years of operational history, confirm your legal team's requirements regarding record retention. FieldPulse's default data retention policy (documented in the Data Retention settings) may differ from your current system's archival rules. It is worth noting that imported historical records are subject to the same retention and deletion policies as natively created records — there is no "grandfathered" status for migrated data.
Audit Trail Continuity: Your current system's audit history (who changed what, when) will not transfer via API. FieldPulse will record the import event itself, but the granular change history from your legacy platform will be lost. From a compliance perspective, consider whether you need to maintain the source system in read-only mode for a defined period to preserve that chain of custody.
Access Control Implications: Historical work orders will inherit the visibility rules of your current FieldPulse permission structure. If your previous system had different confidentiality models (e.g., technicians could only see their own history), verify that FieldPulse's role-based access can replicate this, or plan for a communication strategy if visibility expands.
I would recommend documenting the migration's scope and any intentional data loss (audit trails, attachment metadata, etc.) for your risk register.